Home/ Questions/Q 9679
In Process

askthedev.com Latest Questions

Asked: 2024-09-26T00:34:45+05:30

Finding Distinct Contiguous Subarrays: The \( n \)-Distinct Integer Challenge

I’m working on a coding challenge that’s been bugging me, and I think it could be an interesting puzzle for you all too. Here’s the deal: imagine you have an array of integers, and you need to find all the contiguous subarrays that have at least a given number \( n \) of distinct integers. Sounds simple, right? But it really gets tricky when you start thinking about the different ways to approach it and the performance implications!

Let’s say you have an array like `[1, 2, 1, 2, 3]` and you want to find all the subarrays with at least \( n = 2 \) distinct integers. The valid subarrays in this case would be `[1, 2]`, `[2, 1]`, `[1, 2, 3]`, and several others. The question is: what’s the best way to code this? Do I use a sliding window, or is there a more straightforward approach with nested loops?

One path I considered was using a hash map to track the count of distinct integers as I expand my window. But then I started wondering about edge cases, like what happens when there aren’t enough distinct integers in the entire array to satisfy \( n \). Do I just throw an empty array as the output?

Performance is also a concern because the array can be huge, and a brute-force approach might end up being too slow. I’d love to hear your thoughts on how you’d optimize this. Have any of you tackled something similar before? If so, how did you handle the counting of distinct values, and what’s your go-to method for generating the subarrays?

I’m also curious if anyone has implemented this in a particular programming language that turned out to be really effective or if there were any surprises along the way. It would be awesome to see some example code snippets and discuss the logic behind them. Let’s figure this out together!

Coding Challenge
Share

    Leave an answer

    You must login to add an answer.

    Need An Account,

    2 Answers



    1. Contiguous Subarrays with Distinct Integers

      To solve the problem of finding all contiguous subarrays with at least \( n \) distinct integers, we can use the sliding window technique combined with a hash map to efficiently track the count of distinct integers. The idea is to maintain a window defined by two pointers (left and right) while expanding the right pointer to include more elements. For each new element added to the window, we update our hash map to reflect the count of each integer. When we find that the number of distinct integers meets or exceeds \( n \), we can then extract all valid subarrays from the current window to the left pointer and store them. This way, we ensure that we are not redundantly checking every possible subarray, greatly improving performance over a brute-force approach.

      Here is an example implementation in Python that demonstrates this approach:

              def find_subarrays_with_distinct_integers(arr, n):
            from collections import defaultdict
            
            left = 0
            distinct_count = 0
            count_map = defaultdict(int)
            result = []
            
            for right in range(len(arr)):
                if count_map[arr[right]] == 0:
                    distinct_count += 1
                count_map[arr[right]] += 1
                
                while distinct_count >= n:
                    for i in range(left, right + 1):
                        result.append(arr[i:right + 1])
                    count_map[arr[left]] -= 1
                    if count_map[arr[left]] == 0:
                        distinct_count -= 1
                    left += 1
            
            return result
        
        # Example usage
        arr = [1, 2, 1, 2, 3]
        n = 2
        print(find_subarrays_with_distinct_integers(arr, n))







    2. Contiguous Subarrays Puzzle

      Finding Contiguous Subarrays with Distinct Integers

      Okay, so here’s a quick approach I thought about for finding all contiguous subarrays with at least n distinct integers. This sounds tricky, but I think I can manage it with a sliding window technique!

      Algorithm Overview

      1. Use a loop to expand the right end of the window until you have at least n distinct integers.
      2. Once we reach at least n distinct integers, record all valid subarrays starting from the left end of the window.
      3. Then, increment the left end to see if we can still maintain the distinct count while shrinking the window.

      Example Code in JavaScript

      
function getSubarraysWithNDistinct(arr, n) {
    let left = 0, right = 0;
    const distinctCount = {};
    const result = [];

    while (right < arr.length) {
        // Add the right element into the map
        if (!distinctCount[arr[right]]) {
            distinctCount[arr[right]] = 0;
        }
        distinctCount[arr[right]]++;
        
        // Check if we have at least n distinct integers
        while (Object.keys(distinctCount).length >= n) {
            // Record all valid subarrays 
            for (let i = right; i >= left; i--) {
                result.push(arr.slice(left, i + 1));
            }
            // Remove the left element from the map
            distinctCount[arr[left]]--;
            if (distinctCount[arr[left]] === 0) {
                delete distinctCount[arr[left]];
            }
            left++;
        }
        right++;
    }

    return result;
}

const arr = [1, 2, 1, 2, 3];
const n = 2;
const subarrays = getSubarraysWithNDistinct(arr, n);
console.log(subarrays);

      How It Works

      Basically, we’re using a hash map (the distinctCount) to keep track of how many of each integer we have as we slide our window along the array. When the number of distinct integers reaches n, we record all the subarrays starting from left to the current right.

      Edge Cases

      If the array doesn’t have enough distinct integers to satisfy n, you’d just return an empty array. Easy peasy!

      Performance Consideration

      This sliding window approach should be a bit more efficient than nested loops since each element is processed at most a couple of times (once when added and once when removed).

      I’m excited to see if any of you have run into similar problems and how you’ve tackled them. I’m still learning, and any tips or advice would be super helpful!


    Related Questions